NEWS

Good morning. Complement of the day. Today's message before society. It's appeal before billions of common citizens throughout the world for join us in our anti terrorism,anti war,anti corruption movements. It's appeal before all politicians,terrorists for leaving arms. weapons stop war,terrorism. What future generation will learn from you?War?Terrorism?Corruption?What's yours conscience?

Millions of common citizens throughout the world were killed during yesteryear wars,terrorism but problems remain problems. Arms, weapons,war,terrorism, demolition,destruction can't be solution. Remember that wars,terrorism both are crime.It's our moral responsibility to all children to provide a better,peaceful world.

The discussion of civil liberties and anti-terror addresses the balance needed between protection of fundamental individual rights and the prevention of activity that places the public in harm's way. Terrorism, although difficult to define, can be most succinctly described as any criminal act meant to manipulate a public audience beyond that of its immediate victims. Depending on the viewer, it has been seen both as tactical and strategic, justified and heinous, unlawful and heroic. Regardless of the rationale, it is clear that for the victims, many of whom are indirect or innocent bystanders, terrorism ect.

An anti-war movement(also antiwar) is a social movement, usually in opposition to a particular nation's decision to start or carry on an armed conflict, unconditional of a maybe-existing just cause. The term can also refer to pacifism, which is the opposition to all use of military force during conflicts. Many activists distinguish between anti-war movements and peace movements. Anti-war activists work through protest and other grassroots means to attempt to pressure a government (or governments) to put an end to a particular war or conflict. Various people have discussed the philosophical question of whether war is inevitable, and how much it can be avoided, as well as how this can be achieved i.e. what are the necessities of peace. Various people have discussed it from an intellectual and philosophical point of view. Various intellectuals not only have discussed in public but have participated or led anti-war campaigns despite it is different to their main areas of expertise. They went out of their professional comfort zone to warn against or fight against wars.

Philosophical possibility of avoiding war

• Emmanuel Kant: In (1795) "Perpetual?span>Peace("Zum ewigen Frieden").Immanuel Kant booklet on "Perpetual Peace" in 1795. Politically, Kant was one of the earliest exponents of the idea that perpetual peace could be secured through universal democracy and international cooperation
• George helm Friedrich Hegel suggests, war can never be ruled out, as one can never know when or if one will occur. However, A peaceful revolution is also possible according to Hegel when the changes required to solve the crisis are ascertained by thoughtful insight and when this insight spreads throughout the body politic. (See Hegelianism) Some people claim that Hegel glorified war, this is disputed heavily. This claim has always been based on interpretations only. Hegel's views are often mistaken with the characters of his books, who are the subjects in history

Here is a list of people who outside this field have authority and used their influence and intellectual rigor favor of in the cause of enlightening against the warmongers.

• Linus Pauling was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for his peace activism (his second nobel prize). circulated multiple petitions among scientists.
• Sigmond Freud and Albert Einstein had correspondences on violence, peace, and human nature. 
• Bertrand Russell mostly was a prominent anti-war activist; he championed antiimperialism.Occasionally, he advocated preventive nuclear war, before the opportunity provided by the atomic monopoly is gone, and "welcomed with enthusiasm"world government.He went to prison for his pacifism during World War I.Later, he campaigned against Adolf Hitler, then criticized Stalinist total stalinism, attacked the involvement of the United States in the Vietnam War, and was an outspoken proponent of nuclear disarmament.In 1950 Russell was awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature"in recognition of his varied and significant writings in which he champions humanitarian ideals and freedom of thought"

Manifestos and statements by scientist and intellectual activists

• Einstein,Bertrand,Russell & 8 other leading scientists and intellectuals signed the RussellEinstein Manifestos issued July 9, 1955.
• The Main Declaration of July 15, 1955 was signed by 52 Nobel Prize laureates
• The Dubrovnik-Philadelphia Statement of 1974/1976.was signed by Linus Pauling and others

Americans must be concerned with Wahhabi threat for 150 to 200 of the ISIS terrorists are reportedly Americans who could return home and cause harm far worse than that of 9/11.

In 2013, the European Parliament issued report identifying Wahhabism as the source of international terrorism. Wahhabism can be seen in the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), alQaeda, al-Nusrat, Talaban, al-Shabaab, and Boko Haram. Also, the nineteen terrorists who crashed two commercial planes into the World Trade Center in New York in 2001 held this belief. If we are serious about resolving Wahhabi terrorism, we must seek the root of the problem, which is primarily based in Saudi Arabia.

The ISIS invasion of Iraq is not a Sunni-Shia conflict as stated by United States’ President Obama and international media. It is a conflict between the Wahhabi terrorists and the world.

To characterize ISIS’ occupation as a Sunni-Shia conflict is completely irresponsible for it would generate tension between the Sunni and minority-Shia communities across the world. The mass killing of Sunnis by ISIS within the Sunni Triangle testifies that Wahhabi extremists are not Sunnis despite ISIS’ claim. If Islam truly means peace, then they cannot be Muslims either. ISIS fighters, like other Wahhabi extremist, hate Christians, Jews, and other non-Wahhabis.

In 2010, the United States Secretary of State Hilary Clinton stated that Saudi Arabia is a “critical source of terrorist funding” (The Guardian December 5, 2010). The solution to the terrorism is not to attack Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen, or other countries but rather to convince the Persian Gulf Arab States, especially the Saudi Kingdom, that it is in their own interest to treat international terrorism as a top priority

 Peace BuildingPeace building has a much wider focus than conflict resolution. The second part of this section is dedicated to clarifying the difference between conflict resolution, which generally tends to be actor-focused, and peace building, which is both actor-focused and has more of a structural approach. This is done by diving deeply into the different dimensions of peace building. Accordingly, the challenges of post-conflict peace building are assessed through looking at security dimensions, socio-economic dimensions, political dimensions and reconciliation processes. Through the work with these different dimensions the students will learn about the usefulness of peace building along a continuum – in preventing armed conflict from recurring, in supporting on-going peace processes, and in contributing to post-conflict reconstruction.

We end this part with addressing some important questions on ‘political and ethical intervention from above’ in conflicts and on the agenda of ‘Liberal Peace building

3. Peace and Conflict in South Asia and Africa,south America.

The lectures of this part explore various aspects of conflict and peace in South Asia and Africa. We begin with an overview of recent South Asian history, and especially the history of post- colonial countries in the region. The contemporary situation is presented within this context, especially looking at Communism in India. We continue with exploring the contemporary social, political and economic conflicts in the region, exemplifying them through specific case studies of Dalits, Adivasis and Naxalites in India.

We then look at the complexity and the role of the state in religious-political conflicts in Pakistan and India. Further, the complexity of the role of an ‘International Community’ is analysed through looking at the impact of post war reconstruction as well as International Aid in Afghanistan. Next, the dynamics of the conflict and peace process in Sri Lanka as well as in Nepal are examined. Here my role as a peace facilitator with reference to the peace process in Sri Lanka is discussed, looking at its various successes and failures.

Having formed an understanding of the various complexities of conflict in South Asia, the lectures look into the specific case study of Kashmir, as a conflict between India and Pakistan.However Kashmir is a integral part of India where Pakistan is committing terrorism,instigating in terrorism by providing arms,weapons,money to different Muslim groups.

Nuclear weapons, international denuclearize and nuclear deterrence are also addressed through a contemporary case study of India and Pakistan. Further, the connection between forced migration and conflict is presented with case studies from South Asian countries, directing our attention towards questions concerning refugee protection, security and peace.I had been to Columbia for end of world's longest insurgency along with help of Columbia President Juan Manuel Santos.I am trying hard and soul for end of war, terrorism,poverty alleviation,malnutrition,human development educational progress in Syria,African countries and middle east countries with object to demolish terrorism from grassroots level.

Lastly, the understandings of peace and non-violence are explored through the case studies of Gandhi’s non-violence (Hinduism) and Abdul Ghaffar Khan (Islam). This places peace in the South Asian context, preparing us especially for a multiple of views on and within religions

The South Asia,Africa,south America regions represents a wide range of topics of relevance to peace and conflict studies, all of which cannot be avoidable

The relationship between human rights, development and peace in South Asia,

International war and the atomic threat in Kashmir,Civil war and peace process es in Sri Lanka and Nepal,Syria,Sudan,Iraq,Columbia,Nigeria and others.

Civil war, international intervention, peace building, insurgency and terrorism in Afghanistan,Pakistan,Syria, Sudan,Iraq and others.

· South Asian history of war and peace

Conflicts of caste, class, ethnicity, religion and politics in contemporary India and Pakistan.

· Gandhi and Indian post-colonial philosophy of peace and war.

.Ethics of war and peace in Hinduism, Islam, Buddhism and Christianity.

· Nationalism and post-colonial nation building.

· Independence movements and anti-colonialism in South Asia,Africa and south America regions.

Determined as this campaign has been, it remains to be seen whether it is merely a fight against a particularly ruthless set of criminals or an effort to defeat the motivations of terrorism. Is the war on terrorism a struggle against Osama bin Laden, his Al Qaeda network, and a few like-minded groups, or is it also an effort to undermine the paradigm that anything goes in the name of a cause and the idea that even the slaughter of civilians is an acceptable political act? The answer to these questions will, in the long run, determine the success of the campaign. If conceived broadly, as it should be, the fight against terrorism must be understood as a campaign for human rights because the Geneva Conventions and international human rights law, with their limits on permissible conduct in war, establish that terrorism is not a legitimate act of war or politics. These rules codify the principle that civilians should never deliberately be killed or abused, regardless of the cause. Yet the urgency of the effort to defeat particular terrorists has tempted governments to compromise human rights. Many of the governments joining the fight against terrorism have yet to decide whether this battle provides an opportunity to reaffirm the principles of human rights or a new reason to ignore them, whether this is a moment to embrace values governing means over ends or an excuse to subordinate means to ends. Unless the global anti-terror coalition firmly rejects this morality, and until the rules of international human rights and humanitarian law clearly govern all anti-terror actions, the battle against particular terrorists risks reaffirming the warped instrumentalist

of terrorism. The fight against terrorism is only partly a mater of security; it is also a matter of values. While police, intelligence units, and even armies all have a role to play in meeting particular terrorist threats, terrorism also emanates from the realm of public morality. The pathology that led a group of men to attack thousands of civilians on September 11 may never be understood, but it is essential to understand the mores that would countenance such mass murder as a legitimate political tool. Sympathy for such crimes is the breeding ground for terrorism, and sympathizers are potential recruits. Building a stronger human rights culture--one in which any disregard for civilian life is condemned rather than condoned--is essential for defeating terrorism in the long run.

Middle East Misery

A human rights culture as an antidote to terrorism is especially needed in the Middle East and North Africa, where Al Qaeda attracts many of its adherents. Unfortunately, the willingness of most Western governments to tolerate abuses in the region has undermined human rights. This neglect has incited intense regional anger as the death toll mounts in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and as Iraqi sanctions drag on with no indication that Iraqi President Saddam Hussein will acquiesce to UN demands. The United States has proposed invading Iraq and toppling Hussein, but the Arab world in particular has greeted this proposal coolly, in part because of Washington's weak response to Israeli abuses. The Bush administration has repeatedly called for an end to the "violence," but its reluctance to insist more specifically on a cessation of abuses has made it easier for Israel to respond to suicide bombers with its own disproportionate attacks.

The West's commitment to human rights in places such ask Saudi Arabia and Egypt has also been feeble. In Saudi Arabia, the native land of Osama bin Laden and 15 of the 19 September 11 hijackers, the government strictly limits civil society, severely discriminates against women, and systematically suppresses dissent. But the West has contented itself with purchasing Saudi oil and soliciting Saudi contracts while maintaining its silence toward Saudi abuses.

The problem with terrorism is some group of people believes they are the chosen one by God to commit mass murder in the name of God. The other problem is, some communities have this ‘See no evil, hear no evil and speak no evil’ attitude on terrorism. At the end of the day, as long as people believes their religion is the only true religion and all others are false, there will be no world peace, no end to terrorism and all anti-terrorism effort will be futile

In view with the recent spikes in terrorism bombing and killings in France, Germany and Europe. Whose fault is it? Muslims will blame the Jews and West, the West will blame on Islam and so on. When will this cycle ends? Yes, the west may have caused this many generations ago, but if you react to it, you lose. There is a saying in Buddhism – “Holding on to anger is like grasping a hot coal with the intent of throwing it at someone else; you are the one who gets burned.” All these ISIS, Paris bombing, London Bombing, Berlin Bombing, Moscow Bombing, Washington Bombing, Suicide Bombing, New York Bombing and more doesn't justify anything. Anyway, the most famous terrorist in the world is not Osama Bin laden, it is none other than Ahmed the Dead terrorist by Jeff Durham with his famous line – I Kill You

Corruption is a curse that afflicts many countries. It has become a major cause of concern throughout the world, but especially for developing and under developed countries it has been nothing less than blasphemy. Extensive poverty and economic crisis in these nations have led to corruption. It has infringed upon every aspect of society, government, business, military and so on. Even regulations have failed to combat corruption, as in most cases, even the enforcers and lawmakers have turned out to be corrupt. The corruption quotes given below will give you a deeper understanding of this vice.

Since my boyhood beside academic,professional life I am working for better world through charitable works like (A) equality among people races, religion (B) end of environmental pollution

(C) Global warming( green house effect) .(D) World hunger about starving people,homeless (F) Animal abuse,animal testing, (G) Child abuse (H) Family values end of immorality,adultery (I) crime (J) War & conflict (k) Drugs, AIDS,HIV,CANCER (L) Education & new innovation that can change the world. My years long anti terrorism,anti war,anti corruption campaigns has brought some significant psychological changes with in North Korean President Mr. Moon who decided to foreclose all nuclear activities by this may month. Till my death i have to do a lot for changing this world.

Thank you ,God bless you